Skip to main content

Voting Participation

Voting Participation in the United States

In our current American society, participation in voting is significantly lower than it should be. In 2018, only about 49% of legal and eligible adults went to the ballot and voted. In 2016, only 60% of eligible adults used their right to vote. Why're people not voting? What can the government do, to get more citizens to participate in the voting process?

The electoral college is a burden to the participation of many Americans. The impact that the electoral college has on the election, causes many Americans to think that their vote does not have an impact. While this strategy did a good job for the founding fathers, It's duty doesn't seem as necessary now that our country is more educated and populated. In upcoming and future elections, the popular vote of the citizens should determine who is pronounced the president of the United States. In the 2016 election, Hillary surpassed Donald Trump with about 2.9 million votes, which made Hillary have 2.1% more of the popular vote. However, the Electoral College disagreed with the public causing Trump to win the election.

The restriction of many people voting is their commitment to their job. Currently, citizens have to work around obstacles in their day, to be able to make  their way to the ballot to cast their vote. The solution to this problem is simply to make Election Day its own specific national holiday. Allowing people all day to participate in a day dedicated to voting seems to be the easiest, simplest, and most logical solution. This act of voting is just as if not more important than any other holiday we have today.



Image result for reasons why people don't vote"
Reasons for not voting in the 2008 presidential election


As said earlier, the 2016 election with only 49% eligible voting, could have been highly impacted if more votes were cast. This would have changed our country significantly, and that is backed up by proven logistics. Maybe some voters just need a nudge to go out and let their opinion have an impact on the country they live in. Kimberly Wehle, who is a professor at the University of Baltimore, believes that a tax cut of $50 would give many citizens an economic reason to vote causing citizens to have even more of an impact to vote.

While it is very obvious many eligible citizens need to participate more, the many solutions provided would provide a hefty increase in the number of public votes. It is important that we have more people vote in the future, that way more citizens opinion is represented in our election and government. These solutions also are not terribly harming or difficult to follow through with. So lets put time and effort into this much-needed switch in our current elections.

Works Cited
Case, Steve. "Get More People to Vote." Politico, www.politico.com/interactives/2019/how-to-fix-politics-in-america/participation/get-more-people-to-vote/.
"It's Official: Clinton Swamps Trump in Popular Vote." CNN, www.cnn.com/2016/12/21/politics/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-popular-vote-final-count/index.html.
Traister, Rebecca. "Let More People Vote, More Easily." Politico, www.politico.com/interactives/2019/how-to-fix-politics-in-america/participation/let-more-people-vote-more-easily/.

Comments

  1. Nolan, you've summarized some of the issues with voting. The electoral college issue is a fairly complex one. Is there evidence that there is more information and education in the country today to prove your claim that the populace voting today is more educated and that that reason for the establishment of the electoral college is no longer valid? Is there evidence that people don't vote because of the electoral college?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Your blog was easy to read and got to the point quickly. The only question I have is would citizens be rewarded back their $50 after they had gone out to vote? Without this information it is hard to determine if a $50 tax cut would really encourage people to vote if they weren't given back the money that had been taken from them.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Use in text citations.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Russo-Ukrainian Conflicts

While many might even call it a war, Russian and Ukraine have conflicted since 2014. This started in 2014 when Putin ordered the Russian army to enter Ukrainian territory. This intervention involved the annexing of Crimea for the Russians. Ever since this conflict in 2014, there has been repeated fighting. With about 13.000 soldiers dead, both sides look to put a stoppage in the fighting ("Ellyatt"). Between Putin's Russia, and Volodymyr Zelenskyy's Ukraine, how will the two agree to stop the violence? After a meeting in Paris, France on Monday, the two countries have come up with a 3 step plan to cure their relationship. The first agreement is to come to a cease-fire by the end of 2019 ("Ellyatt"). Meaning that both countries' military in the Donbass area (the area where the fighting is happening) will let each other go. Hoping to have this done by March 2020 both countries have a lot of work to do. With this agreement, all prisoners of war/hostages...

Partisanship and Division

Partisanship and Division cause corruption and problems in our current government. These problems consist of representation, bias, and bad political habits. How can we fix these problems? and what will the fixes change? The main example of a flaw in public representation is how candidates get their money. With the wealthy having more money to spend, some choose to serve as a funder for political candidates. Many of them fund large amounts of money to political parties or specific candidates. In many cases, we don't get to see many candidates because they don't make it to the general election because of the limited funding they are given. This gives the wealthy a power in government meanwhile this power is simply inaccessible to lots of the population. With the United States having a population of 311 million, only about 144 thousand give candidates funding. With that being close to .05% of the population, it's obvious that the other .95% is not represented ("We the P...